In partnership with
In the shadow of banned anthems and boycotted borders, a forgotten Cold War tune roared back to life in Moscow this September, where Vietnam's Duc Phuc hoisted the Intervision trophy amid a swirl of confetti and nationalist cheers.
As Russia resurrects this Soviet-era rival to Eurovision—its defiant melody against Western isolation—the stage spotlights a deeper rift: how geopolitical wars are fracturing the world's cultural harmonies, from song contests to soccer fields, forcing artists and athletes into echo chambers of division.
First time here? Join our intellectually curious readers across Europe. Sign up here
Don’t keep this a secret: Share this email with friends.
And, as always, send us feedback at [email protected].
TL;DR
Russia's revival of the Soviet-era Intervision song contest in 2025 defies its Eurovision ban, spotlighting how geopolitical boycotts in arts and sports—from Ukraine to Gaza—are fracturing global unity into rival blocs.
Summary
☉ In September 2025, Vietnam's Duc Phuc won the revived Intervision contest in Moscow, a Soviet-era alternative to Eurovision that Russia relaunched after being banned due to its 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
☉ President Vladimir Putin praised Intervision as a symbol of cultural trust, while sanctioned artist Shaman highlighted Russia's ideological victory, emphasizing traditional values amid a modest prize of 30 million rubles.
☉ The event reflects broader geopolitical tensions, where boycotts serve as tools to pressure nations, leading to parallel cultural institutions that deepen global divisions.
☉ Similar boycotts target Israel over the Gaza conflict, with countries like Spain threatening to withdraw from Eurovision 2026 if Israel participates, and campaigns urging FIFA and UEFA to suspend Israeli teams.
☉ Historical parallels, such as anti-apartheid sanctions on South Africa or the 1980 Olympic boycott, show that such measures often sideline individuals without resolving conflicts.
☉ Critics argue these boycotts politicize neutral spaces like music and sports, risking echo chambers and eroding cultural diversity, while advocates see them as necessary for accountability.
☉ Ultimately, persistent boycotts fragment global culture into multipolar blocs, eroding the chance at dialogue on neutral platforms like arts or athletics, diminishing opportunities for unity instead of division.
In Moscow's Live Arena, confetti rained down as Vietnam's Duc Phuc clutched the Intervision trophy, his victory anthem echoing through a venue packed with performers from nations like China, India, Cuba, and Belarus.
Revived after decades in obscurity, Intervision—once a Soviet-era riposte to Western cultural dominance—emerged in September 2025 as Russia's defiant answer to its ban from the Eurovision Song Contest following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
President Vladimir Putin, appearing via video link amid ongoing airstrikes in Ukraine, praised the event as a symbol of "trust between cultures," while the sanctioned Russian artist Shaman proclaimed his homeland the true victor.
With a prize of 30 million rubles (about €300,000), Intervision pales against Eurovision's multimillion-euro spectacle, yet it brims with ideological flair: traditional ballads, kitschy green rooms, and a code emphasizing "traditional values" that critics labeled anti-progressive propaganda.
A Broader Geopolitical Symphony
Intervision's 2025 relaunch wasn't born in a vacuum. Banned from Eurovision by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) in response to Russia's aggression in Ukraine, the Kremlin dusted off this Cold War relic to rally allied nations in a display of multipolar soft power. Originally held sporadically from 1977 to 1980 in Sopot, Poland, Intervision pitted socialist blocs against Western influences, much like the Olympics once divided East and West.
Intervision’s revival underscores a broader trend rippling through Europe's cultural landscapes: the resurgence of boycotts as tools of geopolitical pressure. From Moscow's melodic counterpunch to calls for excluding Israel from Eurovision 2026 and international football, boycotts punish individuals in non-political fields for state actions, forcing artists and athletes into ideologically aligned silos.
Politically motivated barriers disable Society’s beautiful capacity to peacefully thrive, not despite, but because of political tensions.
Sociologically, these boycotts aim at enforcing accountability, but they risk creating parallel institutions that deepen divisions, further fragmenting an already divided world community.
Shaman's performance in Moscow, laden with nationalist fervor, exemplifies how states co-opt culture for propaganda. In the long run, this could erode Eurovision's universal appeal, turning the event into an echo chamber while Intervision grows as a rival playlist for the new multipolar world order these divisions create.
Spotlight on Israel: Echoes of Double Standards
The Gaza conflict—now in its third year since the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks—has ignited a boycott wave targeted at Israel, further threatening Europe's apolitical sanctuaries. Spain's RTVE, a "Big Five" Eurovision contributor, voted in September 2025, to withdraw from the 2026 contest if Israel participates. Spain’s ultimatum echoes threats from Ireland, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Iceland, and Belgium, amplifying a debate over double standards: Why ban Russia but not Israel?
Boycotts, like the ones threatened by Spain’s RTVE and #GameOverIsrael, further fragment global culture into blocs, much like the Cold War divisions from the past.
The fervor extends to sports via the #GameOverIsrael campaign, endorsed by football icons like Gary Lineker, Eric Cantona, and Liam Cunningham. The campaign urges UEFA and FIFA to suspend Israeli teams, highlighting the deaths of nearly 800 Palestinian athletes and the razing of Gaza's sports infrastructure.
On X, the discourse is electric. Geopolitics expert Frédéric Encel decries boycotts as "idiotic," arguing they politicize neutral spaces, while journalist Karim Zidan insists accountability prevents extremism. The debate ultimately proves one thing: We live in a world of fractured unity.
Do you like this article? Consider subscribing to Hayloo Unchained for weekly updates.
Lessons from History's Silent Stadiums
Historically, memories of the anti-apartheid campaigns that isolated South Africa from rugby and cricket in the 1970s-80s awaken, or the 1980 US-led Olympic boycott of Moscow over Afghanistan. In the end, these boycotts achieved little but sidelining athletes. Russia's sports isolation hasn't ended the Ukraine war, and similarly, excluding Israel from Europe’s pits and stages might just exacerbate tensions.
Boycotts disrupt social networks, punishing artists and athletes for government policies, turning individuals into proxies against talent exchange and cultural diversity. Politically motivated barriers disable Society’s beautiful capacity to peacefully thrive, not despite, but because of political tensions.
Toward Unity or Eternal Echo Chambers?
Boycotts, like the ones threatened by Spain’s RTVE and #GameOverIsrael, further fragment global culture into blocs, much like the Cold War divisions from the past. Eurovision might lose its pan-European ethos, while football's universality—FIFA's crown jewel—erodes.
An alternative would be promoting dialogue on these neutral cultural platforms, emphasizing sociological responsibility over political stubbornness.
As Europe weighs these choices, remember that societies thrive under voluntary contributions, not coercion. While politics fragments the world in a multipolar disaster, the stage and the pitch should unite instead, not divide, lest we all tune out.
Stay Ahead of the Market
Markets move fast. Reading this makes you faster.
Every weekday, you’ll get a 5-minute Elite Trade Club newsletter covering the top stories, market-moving headlines, and the hottest stocks — delivered before the opening bell.
Whether you’re a casual trader or serious investor, it’s everything you need to know before making your next move. Join 160k+ other investors who get their market news the smart and simple way.
▶ Was this post forwarded to you?